Pneumonia Severity Index — the most accurate tool for stratifying community-acquired pneumonia and safely identifying low-risk patients for outpatient management. Derived by the PORT Investigators (NEJM 1997).
Comorbidities
Examination findings
Labs / Imaging
Enter age to calculate score.
PSI Class I–II patients have <1% mortality and can be treated at home — yet 30–40% are unnecessarily admitted because the score takes too long to calculate manually. EasyClinic auto-computes PSI in real-time and prints the discharge instructions in Hindi/Tamil/Telugu/Bengali.
The Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), also called the PORT score (Pneumonia Outcomes Research Team), is a validated risk-stratification tool for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Developed by Fine et al. (NEJM 1997) from a derivation cohort of 14,199 patients, it classifies patients into 5 risk classes (I–V) using 20 variables across demographics, comorbidities, vital signs, and labs.
It is the most accurate tool for identifying truly low-risk patients (Class I–II, mortality < 1%) who can be safely managed as outpatients — a key recommendation of the IDSA/ATS 2019 guideline.
Before tallying points, check the Class I criteria. A patient qualifies for Class I (no calculation needed) if ALL of these are true:
PSI is the gold standard for identifying truly low-risk patients (high negative predictive value). Its main downside is the 20-variable complexity.
CURB-65 uses only 5 variables and is faster at the bedside. It is comparable to PSI for identifying high-risk patients but less granular at the low-risk end.
Most Indian academic centers use PSI at admission and CURB-65 as a quick OPD/ED triage tool. The IDSA/ATS 2019 guideline prefers PSI.
Not strictly. The pH item adds 30 points but only matters in critically ill patients (who are obviously Class V anyway). SpO₂ < 90% on pulse oximetry substitutes for PaO₂ < 60 mmHg. Indian wards without ABG can still use PSI accurately.
Yes. PSI does NOT account for social factors. The IDSA/ATS 2019 guideline explicitly states that inability to take oral medication, lack of supervision, or unstable home situation are valid reasons to admit a low-PSI patient.
Yes — PSI has been validated in Asian and Indian cohorts (Singh et al. Indian J Chest Dis 2013). However, atypical pathogens (Mycoplasma, Chlamydia) and TB are more prevalent in India, so always cover atypicals with a macrolide/doxycycline and consider sputum AFB.
CURB-65 misses some low-risk patients (false-positive admissions) and is less granular. If your goal is to safely discharge from the ED, PSI is more accurate. If your goal is rapid triage in a busy OPD, CURB-65 is faster.
SMART-COP predicts the need for intensive respiratory or vasopressor support (IRVS), not just mortality — making it more useful for ICU triage. PSI predicts mortality and is better for outpatient decisions. Many EDs calculate both.
EasyClinic pulls age, sex, comorbidities, vitals, ABG/SpO₂, electrolytes, and the X-ray report straight from the chart, calculates PSI + CURB-65 + SMART-COP simultaneously, and writes the right ICS-India antibiotic onto the prescription with chemist MRP.
Choose the plan that fits your practice — cancel anytime.
DOCTORSCRIBE
₹999
/month
EASYCLINIC
₹1,999
/month